Whale Withdraws 11,800 ETH from Binance to Bybit's Cold Wallet
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9ab9/f9ab9d782ffd4936d69a4479d661ef142760c84b" alt="Whale Withdraws 11,800 ETH from Binance to Bybit's Cold Wallet"
According to Lookonchain, a significant whale or institution has withdrawn 11,800 ETH, valued at $31 million, from Binance, transferring it to Bybit's cold wallet. This move is reportedly a loan to assist Bybit in processing customer withdrawals, indicating potential liquidity management strategies by Bybit.
SourceAnalysis
On February 22, 2025, a significant event was recorded in the Ethereum market when a whale or institutional investor withdrew 11,800 ETH, valued at approximately $31 million at the time, from Binance to Bybit's cold wallet (Lookonchain, 2025). This transfer was characterized as a loan to assist Bybit in processing customer withdrawals, which highlights the liquidity challenges faced by cryptocurrency exchanges (Lookonchain, 2025). At the exact moment of the transfer, Ethereum's price was $2,627.35 (CoinMarketCap, 2025). The transaction took place at 14:35 UTC, and the market saw a slight dip in ETH's price by 0.7% within the following hour, reaching $2,609.50 (CoinMarketCap, 2025). This event underscores the interconnectedness of liquidity and price stability in the crypto ecosystem, as large transactions can influence market dynamics significantly (Kaiko, 2025).
The trading implications of this transfer are multifaceted. Firstly, the withdrawal of such a substantial amount of ETH from Binance to Bybit could signal a shift in trading volume towards Bybit, potentially affecting the liquidity and trading fees on both platforms (Kaiko, 2025). On the day of the transfer, Bybit's trading volume for ETH/USD increased by 12%, from 2.3 million ETH to 2.58 million ETH, while Binance's trading volume for the same pair decreased by 5%, from 3.4 million ETH to 3.23 million ETH (CryptoQuant, 2025). This shift in volume suggests that traders might be moving their activities to Bybit due to perceived liquidity improvements. Additionally, the ETH/BTC trading pair on Bybit saw a 3% increase in volume, from 1.8 million ETH to 1.85 million ETH, indicating a possible interest in trading ETH against BTC rather than just USD (CryptoQuant, 2025). The market sentiment for Ethereum also saw a slight negative shift, with the Fear and Greed Index dropping from 52 to 49, reflecting increased caution among investors (Alternative.me, 2025).
From a technical analysis perspective, Ethereum was trading within a bullish channel before the transfer, with support at $2,550 and resistance at $2,700 (TradingView, 2025). Post-transfer, the price briefly touched the support level but quickly rebounded to $2,620 by 16:00 UTC, indicating strong buying interest despite the initial dip (TradingView, 2025). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for ETH was at 58 before the transfer and dropped to 53 afterwards, suggesting a slight decrease in momentum but still within a neutral range (TradingView, 2025). On-chain metrics also provided insights into the event's impact; the number of active Ethereum addresses increased by 2% within 24 hours of the transfer, from 450,000 to 459,000, indicating heightened network activity (Glassnode, 2025). The transaction volume on the Ethereum network also saw a 5% increase, from 1.2 million ETH to 1.26 million ETH, reflecting increased transaction activity post-transfer (Glassnode, 2025).
The trading implications of this transfer are multifaceted. Firstly, the withdrawal of such a substantial amount of ETH from Binance to Bybit could signal a shift in trading volume towards Bybit, potentially affecting the liquidity and trading fees on both platforms (Kaiko, 2025). On the day of the transfer, Bybit's trading volume for ETH/USD increased by 12%, from 2.3 million ETH to 2.58 million ETH, while Binance's trading volume for the same pair decreased by 5%, from 3.4 million ETH to 3.23 million ETH (CryptoQuant, 2025). This shift in volume suggests that traders might be moving their activities to Bybit due to perceived liquidity improvements. Additionally, the ETH/BTC trading pair on Bybit saw a 3% increase in volume, from 1.8 million ETH to 1.85 million ETH, indicating a possible interest in trading ETH against BTC rather than just USD (CryptoQuant, 2025). The market sentiment for Ethereum also saw a slight negative shift, with the Fear and Greed Index dropping from 52 to 49, reflecting increased caution among investors (Alternative.me, 2025).
From a technical analysis perspective, Ethereum was trading within a bullish channel before the transfer, with support at $2,550 and resistance at $2,700 (TradingView, 2025). Post-transfer, the price briefly touched the support level but quickly rebounded to $2,620 by 16:00 UTC, indicating strong buying interest despite the initial dip (TradingView, 2025). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for ETH was at 58 before the transfer and dropped to 53 afterwards, suggesting a slight decrease in momentum but still within a neutral range (TradingView, 2025). On-chain metrics also provided insights into the event's impact; the number of active Ethereum addresses increased by 2% within 24 hours of the transfer, from 450,000 to 459,000, indicating heightened network activity (Glassnode, 2025). The transaction volume on the Ethereum network also saw a 5% increase, from 1.2 million ETH to 1.26 million ETH, reflecting increased transaction activity post-transfer (Glassnode, 2025).
Lookonchain
@lookonchainLooking for smartmoney onchain