Place your ads here email us at info@blockchain.news
NEW
Quantum Computing 'Q-Day' Threatens Bitcoin (BTC) & Ethereum (ETH) as 'Ponzi VCs' Undermine Web3, Warns Analyst | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News
Latest Update
7/4/2025 11:33:00 PM

Quantum Computing 'Q-Day' Threatens Bitcoin (BTC) & Ethereum (ETH) as 'Ponzi VCs' Undermine Web3, Warns Analyst

Quantum Computing 'Q-Day' Threatens Bitcoin (BTC) & Ethereum (ETH) as 'Ponzi VCs' Undermine Web3, Warns Analyst

According to @AltcoinGordon, the cryptocurrency market faces two critical threats that traders must monitor. The first is the imminent risk of 'Q-Day,' where quantum computers could break current encryption, with experts like Tilo Kunz of Quantum Defen5e cited as suggesting this could happen as soon as 2025. This poses a direct threat to major assets, as BlackRock has officially listed quantum computing as a critical risk in its Bitcoin ETF filing. The analysis highlights that an estimated 4 million Bitcoin (BTC) are vulnerable, and Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin has proposed emergency hard forks that could halt the network for years. The second threat comes from 'Ponzi VCs' whose funding models prioritize rapid, predatory exits over sustainable product development. These VCs often secure token unlocks within one to two years, enabling them to dump on retail investors long before a project proves its value. This practice is drawing increased regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the SEC and creating a market filled with 'zombie protocols,' posing significant risks for altcoin investors.

Source

Analysis

The cryptocurrency market is currently navigating a complex and treacherous landscape, caught between immediate systemic fragilities and a looming, long-term existential threat. While major assets are posting significant valuations, with Bitcoin (BTC) trading near $108,165 on some exchanges, a closer look at the market reveals underlying weaknesses and unpriced risks. Over the last 24 hours, BTC has seen a slight pullback of approximately 0.987%, while Ethereum (ETH) has experienced a more pronounced dip of 2.289% to around $2,523. This price action unfolds against a backdrop of two powerful, disruptive forces: the advent of quantum computing and the corrosive influence of unsustainable venture capital models.

The Quantum Shadow Over Crypto Valuations

The concept of "Q-Day"—the moment a quantum computer becomes powerful enough to break current cryptographic standards—is no longer a distant theoretical problem. It represents a fundamental risk to the entire digital asset ecosystem. According to Jay Gambetta, Vice President of IBM Quantum, the threat is already present, as nation-states are actively engaging in "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" attacks, storing encrypted blockchain data with the intent of unlocking it in the future. This risk was formally acknowledged when BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, included quantum computing as a critical risk factor in its Bitcoin ETF filing in May 2025, a move that underscores the seriousness of the threat at the highest levels of institutional finance. Researchers have warned that as much as 25% of all usable Bitcoin, or around 4 million BTC, is stored in addresses vulnerable to quantum attacks. The Elliptic Curve Cryptography used by both Bitcoin and Ethereum is susceptible, placing the two largest crypto-assets directly in the crosshairs. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has even floated the idea of an emergency hard fork to migrate the network to a quantum-resistant state, a process that could take an unknown amount of time and cause unprecedented market disruption. While the market currently sees the ETH/BTC ratio holding at around 0.02327, the shared vulnerability makes this pairing a poor hedge against the quantum threat.

VC Ponzinomics and Market Fragility

While quantum computing poses a long-term threat, the market's short-term stability is being actively undermined by flawed venture capital funding models. A significant portion of crypto funding has devolved into what can be described as ponzinomics, where the primary goal is rapid token liquidity for insiders rather than building sustainable, revenue-generating products. According to Crunchbase data, while global venture financing has declined, a disproportionate amount still flows into token deals with aggressive vesting schedules, often with one-year cliffs and two-year full vesting. This structure prioritizes a quick exit over product-market fit. The recent SEC enforcement action in a $198 million fraud case, where insiders allegedly siphoned millions, serves as a stark blueprint for this exploitative model. These systems rely on a constant influx of new capital to pay off early investors, creating a fragile structure that collapses when funding tightens. This dynamic fuels extreme volatility, contributing to the sharp, short-term drawdowns seen in assets like Solana (SOL), which fell 2.5% to $148.04 on significant volume, and Chainlink (LINK), down 2.65% to $13.22. It creates a market where narratives, rather than utility, drive price action.

Trading in a Bifurcated Risk Environment

For traders, this environment demands a sophisticated understanding of both macro and micro risks. The market is effectively split. On one hand, you have assets like Bitcoin trading at six-figure valuations, suggesting broad market confidence. On the other, the underlying technology is facing a potential cryptographic apocalypse. The current market action reflects this dichotomy. While major assets like BTC and ETH are down, some altcoins are showing relative strength. For instance, the AVAX/BTC pair has surged by an impressive 6.73% in the last 24 hours, indicating that capital is rotating into narratives that may be temporarily insulated from broader concerns or are simply benefiting from speculative fervor. Similarly, LINK/BTC is up over 1%, suggesting some traders see value in oracle networks even amidst market uncertainty. However, the low trading volume for the BTC/USDT pair (9.28) compared to altcoin pairs like LINK/USDT (3,548) and SOL/USDT (2,468) could imply that recent price action is driven more by speculative, retail-driven activity than by deep, institutional liquidity. Traders must weigh the short-term gains from narrative-driven pumps against the long-term, systemic risks that remain largely unpriced by the wider market. The ultimate path forward for the industry requires a dual solution: a technical migration to post-quantum cryptography, as advocated by experts like QRL’s Iain Wood, and a fundamental shift in capital allocation toward sustainable, utility-driven projects.

Gordon

@AltcoinGordon

From $0 to Crypto multi millionaire in 3 years

Place your ads here email us at info@blockchain.news