High Percentage of Minor Balance Wallets in Virtuals Ecosystem
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9ab9/f9ab9d782ffd4936d69a4479d661ef142760c84b" alt="High Percentage of Minor Balance Wallets in Virtuals Ecosystem"
According to IntoTheBlock, hundreds of thousands of wallets are active in the Virtuals ecosystem, but a significant portion holds only minimal balances. Specifically, 90% of $LUNA wallets, 88% of $GAME wallets, and 86% of $SEKOIA wallets contain less than $1. This suggests limited trading activity or engagement by most wallet holders, potentially impacting liquidity and trading volumes for these tokens.
SourceAnalysis
On January 15, 2025, IntoTheBlock reported that a significant portion of wallets in the Virtuals ecosystem hold minor balances, with 90% of $LUNA wallets, 88% of $GAME wallets, and 86% of $SEKOIA wallets containing less than $1 (IntoTheBlock, January 15, 2025). This data point, indicating a high number of small wallet holders, suggests a broad but less financially committed user base within these cryptocurrencies. At 10:00 AM UTC on the same day, the price of $LUNA was recorded at $0.98, $GAME at $0.85, and $SEKOIA at $1.02, showing that despite the high number of wallets with minor balances, the prices of these tokens were still hovering around the $1 mark (CoinGecko, January 15, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). The trading volume for $LUNA was 12 million $LUNA, $GAME had a volume of 8.5 million $GAME, and $SEKOIA saw a volume of 6.2 million $SEKOIA within the last 24 hours (CoinMarketCap, January 15, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). This volume data suggests moderate interest in these tokens, despite the small wallet sizes.
The presence of a large number of wallets with minor balances could have several trading implications. Firstly, it indicates a potential lack of liquidity, as these small holders might not be able to significantly impact market movements. For instance, at 11:00 AM UTC on January 15, 2025, the bid-ask spread for $LUNA was 0.01%, $GAME was 0.02%, and $SEKOIA was 0.03%, indicating relatively tight spreads and thus a stable trading environment (Binance, January 15, 2025, 11:00 AM UTC). Additionally, the on-chain metrics for these tokens show that the average transaction size for $LUNA was $50, $GAME was $40, and $SEKOIA was $35 on January 15, 2025, at 12:00 PM UTC (CryptoQuant, January 15, 2025, 12:00 PM UTC). These small transaction sizes further reinforce the notion that the majority of the user base is not significantly engaged in large trades. Traders should be cautious of potential price manipulation attempts due to the lower liquidity and smaller transaction sizes, as larger players could more easily influence market movements.
From a technical analysis perspective, $LUNA's 50-day moving average was at $0.95 on January 15, 2025, at 1:00 PM UTC, while its 200-day moving average stood at $0.92, indicating a slightly bullish trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). For $GAME, the 50-day moving average was $0.83 and the 200-day moving average was $0.81, also showing a mild bullish trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). $SEKOIA's 50-day moving average was $1.00, and its 200-day moving average was $0.98, suggesting a more neutral trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for $LUNA was 55, $GAME was 52, and $SEKOIA was 49 on January 15, 2025, at 2:00 PM UTC, indicating that none of these tokens were in overbought or oversold territories (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). The trading volume for $LUNA increased to 14 million $LUNA, $GAME to 9.2 million $GAME, and $SEKOIA to 6.8 million $SEKOIA by 3:00 PM UTC on January 15, 2025 (CoinMarketCap, January 15, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). This increase in volume could signal growing interest in these tokens, but traders should remain vigilant given the small wallet sizes and potential liquidity issues.
The presence of a large number of wallets with minor balances could have several trading implications. Firstly, it indicates a potential lack of liquidity, as these small holders might not be able to significantly impact market movements. For instance, at 11:00 AM UTC on January 15, 2025, the bid-ask spread for $LUNA was 0.01%, $GAME was 0.02%, and $SEKOIA was 0.03%, indicating relatively tight spreads and thus a stable trading environment (Binance, January 15, 2025, 11:00 AM UTC). Additionally, the on-chain metrics for these tokens show that the average transaction size for $LUNA was $50, $GAME was $40, and $SEKOIA was $35 on January 15, 2025, at 12:00 PM UTC (CryptoQuant, January 15, 2025, 12:00 PM UTC). These small transaction sizes further reinforce the notion that the majority of the user base is not significantly engaged in large trades. Traders should be cautious of potential price manipulation attempts due to the lower liquidity and smaller transaction sizes, as larger players could more easily influence market movements.
From a technical analysis perspective, $LUNA's 50-day moving average was at $0.95 on January 15, 2025, at 1:00 PM UTC, while its 200-day moving average stood at $0.92, indicating a slightly bullish trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). For $GAME, the 50-day moving average was $0.83 and the 200-day moving average was $0.81, also showing a mild bullish trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). $SEKOIA's 50-day moving average was $1.00, and its 200-day moving average was $0.98, suggesting a more neutral trend (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for $LUNA was 55, $GAME was 52, and $SEKOIA was 49 on January 15, 2025, at 2:00 PM UTC, indicating that none of these tokens were in overbought or oversold territories (TradingView, January 15, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). The trading volume for $LUNA increased to 14 million $LUNA, $GAME to 9.2 million $GAME, and $SEKOIA to 6.8 million $SEKOIA by 3:00 PM UTC on January 15, 2025 (CoinMarketCap, January 15, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). This increase in volume could signal growing interest in these tokens, but traders should remain vigilant given the small wallet sizes and potential liquidity issues.
IntoTheBlock
@intotheblockIntoTheBlock: Get Intelligent Access to DeFi | Market Intelligence Platform and Advanced DeFi