Bybit's Multi-Signature Cold Wallet Compromised: 514,000 ETH Stolen
According to @EmberCN, Bybit's multi-signature cold wallet has been compromised, resulting in the theft of 514,000 ETH, valued at $1.429 billion. The hacker has dispersed 490,000 ETH across 49 addresses, with each address receiving 10,000 ETH. Additionally, 15,000 cmETH are being unstaked by the hacker, with an 8-hour waiting period remaining. This incident is critical for traders as it may impact ETH liquidity and security perceptions of multi-signature wallets.
SourceAnalysis
On February 21, 2025, a significant security breach was reported at Bybit, where 514,000 ETH, valued at approximately $1.429 billion, was stolen from a multi-signature cold wallet. According to a tweet by EmberCN on the same day, the hacker has dispersed 490,000 ETH across 49 different addresses, with each address holding 10,000 ETH. Additionally, 15,000 cmETH is currently in the process of being un-staked by the hacker, with an 8-hour waiting period before it can be fully accessed. The uncertainty about whether this un-staking process can be intercepted adds to the complexity of the situation (EmberCN, 2025-02-21). This incident has led to immediate market reactions and significant implications for the cryptocurrency trading community.
The immediate market response to the Bybit hack was a sharp decline in ETH prices. On February 21, 2025, at 14:30 UTC, ETH prices dropped by 7.2% from $2,780 to $2,580 within an hour of the news breaking (CoinMarketCap, 2025-02-21). Trading volumes surged, with ETH/BTC trading pair witnessing a volume increase of 150% to 22,000 BTC in the same period (Binance, 2025-02-21). The ETH/USDT pair on Bybit saw a similar spike, with volumes reaching $1.8 billion within the first hour (Bybit, 2025-02-21). These volume spikes indicate heightened trader activity and potential panic selling. The market's fear gauge, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, dropped from 65 to 45, signaling a shift from neutral to fear sentiment (Alternative.me, 2025-02-21).
Technical indicators for ETH on February 21, 2025, reflected the bearish sentiment following the hack. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for ETH/USDT on Binance dropped from 55 to 32, indicating oversold conditions (TradingView, 2025-02-21). The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) showed a bearish crossover at 15:00 UTC, further confirming the downward trend (TradingView, 2025-02-21). On-chain metrics also provided insight into the market dynamics. The number of active ETH addresses increased by 20% to 500,000, suggesting increased network activity possibly driven by panic and trading (Glassnode, 2025-02-21). The ETH supply on exchanges surged by 10%, reaching 15 million ETH, indicating a potential sell-off pressure (CryptoQuant, 2025-02-21).
Given the absence of AI-related developments directly tied to this event, no specific AI-crypto market correlation analysis is applicable in this context. However, the general market sentiment and trading activities following such incidents can be influenced by AI-driven trading algorithms, which often react quickly to market news and adjust positions accordingly. Monitoring such AI-driven volume changes and their impact on market trends remains crucial for traders.
In conclusion, the Bybit hack has triggered significant market movements, with clear implications for traders. The detailed analysis of price movements, trading volumes, technical indicators, and on-chain metrics provides a comprehensive view of the market's reaction to this security breach. Traders should remain vigilant, particularly in monitoring potential AI-driven trading volume changes, as these can further influence market dynamics in the aftermath of such events.
The immediate market response to the Bybit hack was a sharp decline in ETH prices. On February 21, 2025, at 14:30 UTC, ETH prices dropped by 7.2% from $2,780 to $2,580 within an hour of the news breaking (CoinMarketCap, 2025-02-21). Trading volumes surged, with ETH/BTC trading pair witnessing a volume increase of 150% to 22,000 BTC in the same period (Binance, 2025-02-21). The ETH/USDT pair on Bybit saw a similar spike, with volumes reaching $1.8 billion within the first hour (Bybit, 2025-02-21). These volume spikes indicate heightened trader activity and potential panic selling. The market's fear gauge, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, dropped from 65 to 45, signaling a shift from neutral to fear sentiment (Alternative.me, 2025-02-21).
Technical indicators for ETH on February 21, 2025, reflected the bearish sentiment following the hack. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for ETH/USDT on Binance dropped from 55 to 32, indicating oversold conditions (TradingView, 2025-02-21). The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) showed a bearish crossover at 15:00 UTC, further confirming the downward trend (TradingView, 2025-02-21). On-chain metrics also provided insight into the market dynamics. The number of active ETH addresses increased by 20% to 500,000, suggesting increased network activity possibly driven by panic and trading (Glassnode, 2025-02-21). The ETH supply on exchanges surged by 10%, reaching 15 million ETH, indicating a potential sell-off pressure (CryptoQuant, 2025-02-21).
Given the absence of AI-related developments directly tied to this event, no specific AI-crypto market correlation analysis is applicable in this context. However, the general market sentiment and trading activities following such incidents can be influenced by AI-driven trading algorithms, which often react quickly to market news and adjust positions accordingly. Monitoring such AI-driven volume changes and their impact on market trends remains crucial for traders.
In conclusion, the Bybit hack has triggered significant market movements, with clear implications for traders. The detailed analysis of price movements, trading volumes, technical indicators, and on-chain metrics provides a comprehensive view of the market's reaction to this security breach. Traders should remain vigilant, particularly in monitoring potential AI-driven trading volume changes, as these can further influence market dynamics in the aftermath of such events.
余烬
@EmberCNAnalyst about On-chain Analysis