Bitrue Hack Update: 1050 ETH Moved to Tornado Cash, $25.5M in ETH and DAI Remain in New Wallet – Key Insights for Crypto Traders

According to EmberCN on Twitter, the Bitrue exchange hacker converted stolen SHIB and HOT tokens into Ethereum, then deposited 1050 ETH (approximately $1.9M) into Tornado Cash to obscure the funds' trail. The hacker transferred the remaining assets, including 5,111.5 ETH ($9.2M) and 16.345 million DAI (worth $25.545M in total), to a new address for storage. This movement of large ETH and DAI volumes out of Bitrue may impact market liquidity and raise caution for traders monitoring unusual on-chain activity and potential sell-off risks. (Source: twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1916477838406111542)
SourceAnalysis
The recent Bitrue hack has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency market, with significant on-chain activity providing critical insights for traders. On April 27, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM UTC, blockchain security analyst EmberCN reported that the Bitrue hacker converted stolen Shiba Inu (SHIB) and Holo (HOT) tokens into Ethereum (ETH), subsequently depositing 1,050 ETH, valued at $1.9 million, into Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused mixer designed to obscure transaction trails (Source: EmberCN Twitter, April 27, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). Following this, the hacker moved the remaining assets to a new wallet address, which included 5,111.5 ETH worth $9.2 million and 16.345 million DAI valued at $16.345 million, bringing the total transferred value to approximately $25.545 million (Source: EmberCN Twitter, April 27, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). This event has raised concerns about security vulnerabilities in centralized exchanges and their impact on market sentiment. The immediate price reaction saw ETH experience a slight dip of 0.8% within two hours of the news breaking, moving from $1,820.50 at 10:00 AM UTC to $1,805.94 by 12:00 PM UTC on April 27, 2025, as tracked on CoinGecko. Meanwhile, SHIB and HOT faced sharper declines, with SHIB dropping 2.3% from $0.00001025 to $0.00001001 and HOT falling 1.9% from $0.0021 to $0.00206 in the same timeframe (Source: CoinGecko, April 27, 2025, 12:00 PM UTC). Trading volumes for these assets spiked significantly, indicating heightened market activity and potential profit-taking or panic selling among retail investors. This incident also highlights the ongoing relevance of privacy tools like Tornado Cash in illicit activities, which could influence regulatory sentiment and trader behavior in the near term. For those searching for 'Bitrue hack impact on crypto prices' or 'ETH price movement April 2025,' this event underscores the interconnected risks in the crypto ecosystem and the need for robust security measures.
From a trading perspective, the Bitrue hack offers several actionable insights for investors navigating this volatile landscape. The movement of 1,050 ETH into Tornado Cash at 10:00 AM UTC on April 27, 2025, suggests an attempt to launder funds, which could lead to increased scrutiny on ETH transactions in the short term (Source: EmberCN Twitter, April 27, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). This might temporarily suppress ETH buying interest, particularly among institutional players wary of regulatory backlash. Traders should monitor ETH/BTC and ETH/USDT pairs closely, as the ETH/BTC pair saw a 0.5% decline from 0.0592 to 0.0589 between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM UTC on April 27, 2025, reflecting relative weakness against Bitcoin (Source: Binance, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). Similarly, SHIB/USDT and HOT/USDT pairs exhibited elevated selling pressure, with SHIB/USDT trading volume surging by 35% to $18.7 million and HOT/USDT volume increasing by 28% to $5.4 million within four hours of the hack news (Source: CoinMarketCap, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). On-chain metrics further reveal that the hacker’s new wallet address holding 5,111.5 ETH and 16.345 million DAI has not yet initiated further transfers as of 3:00 PM UTC on April 27, 2025, suggesting a potential waiting period before additional laundering attempts (Source: Etherscan, April 27, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). For traders, this could signal a window of opportunity to short ETH or related altcoins if negative sentiment persists, or to watch for a reversal if market absorption of the news stabilizes prices. Those researching 'crypto trading strategies after hacks' or 'how to trade ETH after security breaches' should consider these dynamics alongside broader market trends.
Delving into technical indicators and volume data, the Bitrue hack has left measurable footprints on market behavior as of April 27, 2025. For ETH, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 4-hour chart dropped to 42 at 2:00 PM UTC, indicating a shift toward oversold territory and potential for a bounce if buying pressure returns (Source: TradingView, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) also showed a bearish crossover at 12:00 PM UTC, with the signal line moving below the MACD line, reinforcing short-term downside risk (Source: TradingView, April 27, 2025, 12:00 PM UTC). Trading volume for ETH/USDT on major exchanges like Binance spiked by 22% to $1.2 billion between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM UTC, reflecting heightened trader activity post-hack (Source: Binance, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). For SHIB and HOT, the volume-to-market-cap ratio surged, with SHIB recording a ratio of 0.18 and HOT at 0.15 by 1:00 PM UTC, suggesting significant liquidations or speculative trading (Source: CoinMarketCap, April 27, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). On-chain data from Glassnode indicates a 15% increase in ETH wallet addresses sending funds to exchanges between 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM UTC, likely tied to profit-taking or risk aversion following the hack news (Source: Glassnode, April 27, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). While this analysis does not directly tie into AI-related crypto tokens, the broader market sentiment influenced by such hacks could impact AI-driven trading algorithms and volume in tokens like FET or AGIX if institutional trust in centralized exchanges wanes. Traders searching for 'technical analysis after crypto hacks' or 'ETH RSI trends April 2025' can use these metrics to inform entry and exit points, while keeping an eye on regulatory news that may follow the use of Tornado Cash in this incident. This comprehensive breakdown ensures traders have the data needed to navigate this evolving situation effectively.
From a trading perspective, the Bitrue hack offers several actionable insights for investors navigating this volatile landscape. The movement of 1,050 ETH into Tornado Cash at 10:00 AM UTC on April 27, 2025, suggests an attempt to launder funds, which could lead to increased scrutiny on ETH transactions in the short term (Source: EmberCN Twitter, April 27, 2025, 10:00 AM UTC). This might temporarily suppress ETH buying interest, particularly among institutional players wary of regulatory backlash. Traders should monitor ETH/BTC and ETH/USDT pairs closely, as the ETH/BTC pair saw a 0.5% decline from 0.0592 to 0.0589 between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM UTC on April 27, 2025, reflecting relative weakness against Bitcoin (Source: Binance, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). Similarly, SHIB/USDT and HOT/USDT pairs exhibited elevated selling pressure, with SHIB/USDT trading volume surging by 35% to $18.7 million and HOT/USDT volume increasing by 28% to $5.4 million within four hours of the hack news (Source: CoinMarketCap, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). On-chain metrics further reveal that the hacker’s new wallet address holding 5,111.5 ETH and 16.345 million DAI has not yet initiated further transfers as of 3:00 PM UTC on April 27, 2025, suggesting a potential waiting period before additional laundering attempts (Source: Etherscan, April 27, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). For traders, this could signal a window of opportunity to short ETH or related altcoins if negative sentiment persists, or to watch for a reversal if market absorption of the news stabilizes prices. Those researching 'crypto trading strategies after hacks' or 'how to trade ETH after security breaches' should consider these dynamics alongside broader market trends.
Delving into technical indicators and volume data, the Bitrue hack has left measurable footprints on market behavior as of April 27, 2025. For ETH, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 4-hour chart dropped to 42 at 2:00 PM UTC, indicating a shift toward oversold territory and potential for a bounce if buying pressure returns (Source: TradingView, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) also showed a bearish crossover at 12:00 PM UTC, with the signal line moving below the MACD line, reinforcing short-term downside risk (Source: TradingView, April 27, 2025, 12:00 PM UTC). Trading volume for ETH/USDT on major exchanges like Binance spiked by 22% to $1.2 billion between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM UTC, reflecting heightened trader activity post-hack (Source: Binance, April 27, 2025, 2:00 PM UTC). For SHIB and HOT, the volume-to-market-cap ratio surged, with SHIB recording a ratio of 0.18 and HOT at 0.15 by 1:00 PM UTC, suggesting significant liquidations or speculative trading (Source: CoinMarketCap, April 27, 2025, 1:00 PM UTC). On-chain data from Glassnode indicates a 15% increase in ETH wallet addresses sending funds to exchanges between 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM UTC, likely tied to profit-taking or risk aversion following the hack news (Source: Glassnode, April 27, 2025, 3:00 PM UTC). While this analysis does not directly tie into AI-related crypto tokens, the broader market sentiment influenced by such hacks could impact AI-driven trading algorithms and volume in tokens like FET or AGIX if institutional trust in centralized exchanges wanes. Traders searching for 'technical analysis after crypto hacks' or 'ETH RSI trends April 2025' can use these metrics to inform entry and exit points, while keeping an eye on regulatory news that may follow the use of Tornado Cash in this incident. This comprehensive breakdown ensures traders have the data needed to navigate this evolving situation effectively.
Tornado Cash
on-chain activity
crypto security
ETH transfer
crypto trading risk
Bitrue hack
DAI movement
余烬
@EmberCNAnalyst about On-chain Analysis