According to Lookonchain, DWF Labs deposited 2,200 ETH, valued at $6.02 million, to the cryptocurrency exchange Bybit an hour ago. This substantial deposit could indicate potential trading activity or market strategy by DWF Labs, possibly impacting Ethereum's market liquidity and price dynamics on the Bybit platform. Monitoring further transactions and market reactions could provide insights into trading strategies and market movements.

According to Lookonchain, DWF Labs has deposited 2,200 ETH, valued at $6.02 million, into the Bybit exchange. This significant movement of Ethereum could indicate a potential sell-off or strategic trading move by DWF Labs, which may impact Ethereum's market liquidity and price dynamics on Bybit. Traders should monitor Bybit's order books for potential large sell orders that could influence market conditions. [Source: Lookonchain via Twitter]

According to Lookonchain, Bybit has executed an over-the-counter (OTC) transaction, purchasing 36,893 ETH at a price of $2,711 per ETH, amounting to $100 million USDT. The transaction was conducted with Galaxy Digital and FalconX. This substantial acquisition indicates a strategic move by Bybit to bolster its Ethereum holdings, potentially reflecting confidence in Ethereum's future value. Traders should monitor Ethereum's price movements and Bybit's trading activities for further implications on the market.

According to Lookonchain, Bybit executed a significant over-the-counter (OTC) purchase, acquiring 36,893 ETH at a price of $2,711 each, totaling $100 million USDT. The transaction was facilitated by Galaxy Digital and FalconX, providing Bybit with a substantial ETH holding, potentially impacting market liquidity and trading strategies.

According to Lookonchain, a hacker associated with the Lazarus Group has transferred 10,000 ETH (valued at $27 million) to Bybit Exploiter 54 to begin laundering the funds. The hacker still retains 489,395 ETH, valued at approximately $1.32 billion, and 15,000 cmETH in 53 other wallets, although the cmETH is currently non-withdrawable. This activity suggests significant market implications as such large-scale transfers could influence ETH liquidity and volatility.

According to Lookonchain, the Bybit hacker, associated with Lazarus Group, has transferred 10,000 ETH ($27 million) to Bybit Exploiter 54 to start laundering funds. The hacker currently holds a significant amount of 489,395 ETH ($1.32 billion) and 15,000 cmETH across 53 wallets, but the cmETH remains non-withdrawable.

According to Lookonchain, after being hacked, Bybit has received a total of 145,879 ETH, equivalent to $390 million, in loans and deposits. Large withdrawals include 47,800 ETH ($127.56 million) moved from Binance to Bybit as loans, and Bitget transferring 40,000 ETH ($106 million) to Bybit. Additionally, a whale identified as '0x3275' transferred 20,000 ETH ($53.7 million) to Bybit.

According to Lookonchain, after being hacked, Bybit has received a total of 145,879 ETH, valued at $390 million, in loans and deposits. Significant whale activity includes a withdrawal of 47,800 ETH ($127.56 million) from Binance to Bybit as loans. Furthermore, Bitget transferred 40,000 ETH ($106 million) to Bybit as loans, and whale '0x3275' moved 20,000 ETH ($53.7 million) to Bybit. These substantial inflows suggest a strategic consolidation of assets by major players into Bybit, indicating potential confidence in its recovery and future trading opportunities.

According to Lookonchain, a whale has transferred 20,000 ETH, valued at $53.7 million, to a Bybit cold wallet. This substantial transfer could indicate a strategic move to secure assets or prepare for future trading activities, impacting ETH market liquidity and potentially influencing price volatility. Traders should monitor such large movements as they can signal upcoming market shifts.

According to Lookonchain, a whale has transferred 20,000 ETH, valued at approximately $53.7 million, to a Bybit cold wallet. Such large transfers can indicate significant market movements as whales' actions often lead to increased market volatility or potential sell-offs. Monitoring this transfer could provide insights into future price movements of ETH on the Bybit platform.

According to Lookonchain on Twitter, the hacker responsible for stealing $1.4 billion from Bybit and $69 million from Phemex has been identified as part of the Lazarus Group. The stolen funds were laundered by transferring ETH to wallet '0x33d0...8F65'. This highlights a significant security risk for cryptocurrency exchanges, potentially affecting trading strategies and trust in exchange platforms. Source: @zachxbt.

According to @lookonchain, the hackers who stole $1.4 billion from Bybit and $69 million from Phemex appear to be the same group. The funds were laundered by transferring ETH to the wallet '0x33d0...8F65'. @zachxbt reports that the perpetrators are linked to the Lazarus Group, indicating a sophisticated and coordinated attack strategy.

According to Lookonchain, a substantial transfer of 36,000 ETH, valued at approximately $96.5 million, was executed from Binance's hot wallet to Bybit's cold wallet within the last 15 minutes. Such large movements might indicate strategic reallocations by large holders or institutions, potentially influencing short-term liquidity and market sentiment on both platforms.

According to Lookonchain, a substantial transfer of 36,000 ETH, valued at $96.5 million, was made from Binance's hot wallet to Bybit's cold wallet within the last 15 minutes. Such large movements of Ethereum between exchanges can indicate significant trading activities or strategic reallocations. Traders should monitor the market for potential impacts on Ethereum's price and liquidity as such transfers may affect market dynamics. (Source: Lookonchain)

According to Lookonchain, a significant whale or institution has withdrawn 11,800 ETH, valued at $31 million, from Binance, transferring it to Bybit's cold wallet. This move is reportedly a loan to assist Bybit in processing customer withdrawals, indicating potential liquidity management strategies by Bybit.

According to Lookonchain, a whale or institution withdrew 11,800 ETH, valued at $31 million, from Binance to Bybit's cold wallet as a loan to assist Bybit in processing customer withdrawals. This substantial movement of funds indicates potential liquidity challenges at Bybit, which traders should monitor closely for any impact on ETH trading volumes and price action.

According to Lookonchain, Bitget transferred 40,000 ETH, valued at $106 million, to Bybit as a loan to facilitate customer withdrawals. This move indicates a strategic attempt by Bybit to maintain liquidity amidst high withdrawal demands. The transaction showcases proactive liquidity management between these platforms, which is critical for maintaining user trust and operational stability in volatile market conditions.

According to Lookonchain, Bitget transferred 40,000 ETH, valued at $106 million, to Bybit as a loan to facilitate customer withdrawals. This transaction suggests significant liquidity requirements at Bybit and indicates active collaboration between major exchanges to manage withdrawal demands. Such movements can impact ETH liquidity and potentially influence short-term price fluctuations. Traders should monitor further on-chain movements and exchange announcements for additional insights.

According to Lookonchain, the hacker who attacked Bybit, stealing $1.4 billion in assets, appears to have received Ethereum (ETH) from Binance as gas fees. This transaction was identified through the Ethereum blockchain explorer, Etherscan. The connection between the hacker's activities and Binance could have implications for both exchanges regarding security measures and customer trust. Bybit and Binance are expected to enhance their monitoring of suspicious transactions to prevent future breaches.

According to Lookonchain, the hacker who attacked Bybit and stole $1.4 billion in assets received Ethereum from Binance for gas fees, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in exchange interactions and fund movements. This incident emphasizes the importance for traders to monitor exchange security protocols closely and verify the origins of transactions to prevent similar breaches.